Douglas Crets

Icon

Giving Credibility to the Shadow Education System

The dB C Media Influence Network Works in 53 Countries

If you are looking to get specific jobs done for your career, or for your business, you can look through us. We have an expert influencer network in over 50 countries on 5 continents. Take a look at where we have been and where we know experts that can help you in media, finance, tech, mobile computing, education technology, enterprise solutions, commerce and government.

Visited Countries

Visited Countries Map from TravelBlog

Advertisements

Filed under: Influence, , , , , , , , ,

Carol Bartz Leaves Yahoo!’s Board of Directors

Carol Bartz has resigned from the Yahoo! Board of Directors. Only seeing some Chinese language reports now, but will link to the ones in English.

Filed under: Tech, , , , , ,

Shortcut: Getting Through to People Who Slow You Down

This is an interview with Brian Tolle, author of Shortcut: Getting Through to the People Who Slow You Down.

 

Douglas Crets: When one first opens your book, the immediate thinking might be that communication alone can solve all workplace problems, but it appears that it’s not just communication that helps the work environment. Can you explain why just talking things out with someone isn’t enough? A lot of built-in HR and internal consulting basically falls to this default “talk it out” setting.

Brian Tolle: Where I have seen increased awareness and application of these styles (talking things out) come up short in improving interpersonal relationships and teamwork is where there are conflicting priorities and/or values among the team members or between the two individuals. And because so much personal identity and emotions are tied up with one’s priorities and values, there are situations where a communication impasse remains. That’s when a higher order of “talking it out” is required and it usually involves some form of negotiation (see Fisher & Ury’s classic Getting to Yes for more on their “principled negotiation” as an example of the next order up of communication clarity). Without some version of negotiation, what I have seen is that, depending on the rigidity of each person’s stand, the only way to break the impasse is through the decision of someone in authority. It’s quick but not long lasting. The “agreement” reached usually falls apart fairly quickly from both parties.

What is the immediate and then long-term incentive for people to read your studies of how different workplace personalities interact and inhibit each other’s sense of progress? Will we make more money this way? Is it a pathway to more innovation? Career success?

So it’s the core question: What’s in it for me to invest in trying this stuff out? Here are the answers I share in my workshops:

 

  • Increased time efficiency (and decrease in related stress). How many of you have had the same conversation with the same person more than once? Not the best use of your time the third or fourth time around. How much stress is generated with each round of poor communication? Are you speaking their language from the very start?
  • Greater likelihood for innovation and creativity. Ideas get shared, explored, and considered when there are open lines of communication present. This includes both offering and soliciting ideas.
  • Decrease in “churning”, or that sense that one is working really hard and not making the commensurate progress.
  • Achieving results that stick. How many times do we think we got agreement in a meeting, only to find out later that the attendees are pursuing different agendas?

 

Speaking more broadly, what do you think it is about corporate culture or our culture in general that makes people feel comfortable with approaching work and solutions only through their own personality? I get the sense that the answer to this question is not as obvious as it appears.

What I have seen is that people, as individual contributors in organizations, are rewarded (praise, promotions, etc.) for getting things done and the way they get things done is their preferred way of doing things, which gets reinforced through these rewards. This is fine until they rise high enough in an organization where he/she needs to get things done through others and those others have a diversity of preferred ways of doing things. That’s when he/she needs some guide through the “mystery” of human communication.

Filed under: Influence, Work, , , , ,

Social Experiment Rounding Up

I interviewed a group of people about their careers, their education, and how social media has influenced some of their choices in those areas. The plan was to then have each of them answer a specific question about their careers for Daily Endeavor. Daily Endeavor is the place to go for the new wave in how jobs will be selected, and created, for those who pursue what they love in their careers.

Here are the interviews.

Heath Black, Social Strategist, Always Be Social

Al Meyers, Consultant

Mark Schneidermann, Director, SIIA

Ted Fujimoto, Founder, Right to Succeed

Jason Rosoff

Noeline Wright, Senior Research Officer, University of Waikato, New Zealand

Jared Huke, Advertising Creative

Brenda Christensen, Director of PR, Nimble

DeLeana Tonks, Director, Open High School of Utah

Ryan Busch, President, EduFire

Filed under: Influence, Tech, Work, , , , , , , , , ,

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 48 other followers